linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions with fsl,pins property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 13:21:20 +0000
From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>, Sudeep Holla
	<sudeep.holla@....com>, Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>, Rob
 Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor
 Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer
	<s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
	Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions with
 fsl,pins property

Hi Linus,

Thanks for your quick response.

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions with
> fsl,pins property
> 
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 10:36 AM Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Linus, Sudeep, Cristian,
> >
> > > Subject: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions
> > > with fsl,pins property
> >
> > Sorry if this is an early ping to you. Just wanna this not blocking
> > i.MX95 upstream support.
> >
> > Are you ok with this patchset?
> 
> Patch 1 is fine as it's ACKed by the DT maintainers.
> 
> Patch 2 patches the SCMI pinctrl driver and patch 3 uses
> module_scmi_driver(), so I cannot merge any of these patches without ACK
> from the SCMI maintainers.

Sudeep, Cristian, May I get your ACK for the patches?

> 
> The code in patch 3 looks OK but I will comment on it, no big deal though.

Thanks, I just replied there.

Thanks,
Peng.

> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij