lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o78rnz3a.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 07:50:17 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Yunseong Kim <yskelg@...il.com>
Cc: skhan@...uxfoundation.org, Jinwoo Park <pmnxis@...il.com>, Austin Kim
 <austindh.kim@...il.com>, shjy180909@...il.com, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: cve Korean translation

Yunseong Kim <yskelg@...il.com> writes:

>> 1) Why do I have three versions of it in my mailbox, sent over a period
>>    of 13 minutes?  What changed between the versions?
>
> Sorry, I forgot the name of the reviewer when I first sent the
> documentation content related patch version 2.

Which is fine, but...

>>    Normally, you want to wait for reviews to come in on one version
>>    before posting the next, and you should put a comment after the "---"
>>    line saying what changed.
>> 
>> 2) When did this review from Jinwoo Park happen?  I was not copied on
>>    that.

You did not answer this question.  Reviews should generally be done in
public, but that does not seem to have happened here?

Thanks,

jon

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ