linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: Add cache information to the SoC dtsi for H6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGb2v66vFh4twtsT_ZojGe14k_kvAm8Y9AHBRikDLp626u8iOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 00:06:34 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To: Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>
Cc: jernej.skrabec@...il.com, samuel@...lland.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: Add cache information to the SoC
 dtsi for H6

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 12:02 AM Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hello Chen-Yu,
>
> On 2024-05-28 17:56, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 11:46 PM Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 13:40:36 +0200, Dragan Simic wrote:
> >> > Add missing cache information to the Allwinner H6 SoC dtsi, to allow
> >> > the userspace, which includes lscpu(1) that uses the virtual files provided
> >> > by the kernel under the /sys/devices/system/cpu directory, to display the
> >> > proper H6 cache information.
> >> >
> >> > Adding the cache information to the H6 SoC dtsi also makes the following
> >> > warning message in the kernel log go away:
> >> >
> >> > [...]
> >>
> >> Applied to sunxi/dt-for-6.11 in sunxi/linux.git, thanks!
> >>
> >> [1/1] arm64: dts: allwinner: Add cache information to the SoC dtsi for
> >> H6
> >>       https://git.kernel.org/sunxi/linux/c/c8240e4b0fd2
> >
> > OK, that's weird. Somehow b4 thought this patch was v2 of the A64 patch
> > [1].
> > Looks like they are threaded together because this patch has
> > "In-Reply-To".
> >
> > Please avoid it in the future.
>
> I'm sorry for that.  I noticed that back when I sent the patches to the
> mailing list, but didn't want to make some noise about that.  The root
> cause was some missing configuration for "git send-email", which
> resulted
> in adding troublesome threading-related headers to the messages for the
> individual .patch files that in fact were correctly created by running
> "git format-patch".
>
> Do I need to resend the patches?

No. I figured it out.