[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5e571478-46d0-489e-a8a1-c39813c20156@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 18:09:10 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"open list:REAL TIME CLOCK (RTC) SUBSYSTEM" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: rtc: Convert rtc-fsl-ftm-alarm.txt to
yaml format
On 28/05/2024 18:01, Frank Li wrote:
>>> +required:
>>> + - compatible
>>> + - reg
>>> + - interrupts
>>> + - fsl,rcpm-wakeup
>>> +
>>
>> Missing allOf with ref to rtc.yaml.
>>
>>> +unevaluatedProperties: false
>>
>> becauase otherwise above does not make much sense... unless this is not
>> a RTC?
>
> Sorry! which one doesn't make sense? I suppose not "unevaluatedProperties".
>
unevaluated does not make sense on its own. For some rationale or
background see example-schema, writing bindings or my old slides.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists