linux-kernel - Re: soundwire: fix usages of device_get_named_child

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 18:55:33 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
 Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
 Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Bard Liao <bard.liao@...el.com>
Subject: Re: soundwire: fix usages of device_get_named_child_node()

>>>>> Add fwnode_handle_put() to avoid leaked references.
>>>>
>>>> Are you going to respond also to my previous patch review
>>>> in more constructive ways?
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/eb15ab0a-e416-4ae9-98bb-610fdc04492c@webde/
>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2024/4/29/493
>>>
>>> Sorry about that, both Bard and I missed your comments.
>>
>> How could this happen?
>
> Becuase your emails go to dev/null for most of people!

I am aware of some communication challenges.

Is it interesting that my enquiry for this “PATCH RESEND” triggered
a constructive response finally?

Regards,
Markus