[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZlYkEIDqiot10w1s@pc636>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 20:36:00 +0200
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/vmalloc: Use __this_cpu_try_cmpxchg() in
preload_this_cpu_lock()
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 04:43:14PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Use __this_cpu_try_cmpxchg() instead of
> __this_cpu_cmpxchg (*ptr, old, new) == old in
> preload_this_cpu_lock(). x86 CMPXCHG instruction returns
> success in ZF flag, so this change saves a compare after cmpxchg.
>
> The generated code improves from:
>
> 4bb6: 48 85 f6 test %rsi,%rsi
> 4bb9: 0f 84 10 fa ff ff je 45cf <...>
> 4bbf: 4c 89 e8 mov %r13,%rax
> 4bc2: 65 48 0f b1 35 00 00 cmpxchg %rsi,%gs:0x0(%rip)
> 4bc9: 00 00
> 4bcb: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
> 4bce: 0f 84 fb f9 ff ff je 45cf <...>
>
> to:
>
> 4bb6: 48 85 f6 test %rsi,%rsi
> 4bb9: 0f 84 10 fa ff ff je 45cf <...>
> 4bbf: 4c 89 e8 mov %r13,%rax
> 4bc2: 65 48 0f b1 35 00 00 cmpxchg %rsi,%gs:0x0(%rip)
> 4bc9: 00 00
> 4bcb: 0f 84 fe f9 ff ff je 45cf <...>
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
> Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> ---
> v2: Show generated code improvement in the commit message.
> ---
> mm/vmalloc.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 5d3aa2dc88a8..4f34d935d648 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -1816,7 +1816,7 @@ static void free_vmap_area(struct vmap_area *va)
> static inline void
> preload_this_cpu_lock(spinlock_t *lock, gfp_t gfp_mask, int node)
> {
> - struct vmap_area *va = NULL;
> + struct vmap_area *va = NULL, *tmp;
>
> /*
> * Preload this CPU with one extra vmap_area object. It is used
> @@ -1832,7 +1832,8 @@ preload_this_cpu_lock(spinlock_t *lock, gfp_t gfp_mask, int node)
>
> spin_lock(lock);
>
> - if (va && __this_cpu_cmpxchg(ne_fit_preload_node, NULL, va))
> + tmp = NULL;
> + if (va && !__this_cpu_try_cmpxchg(ne_fit_preload_node, &tmp, va))
> kmem_cache_free(vmap_area_cachep, va);
> }
>
> --
> 2.42.0
>
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@...il.com>
Thanks!
--
Uladzislau Rezki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists