[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg_-MyVH0CJv16PqGkuzYMTRAT=a95HFEnzk4=WnpwM-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 14:42:51 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...ux.dev>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>, Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf evlist: Force adding default events only to core PMUs
On Tue, 28 May 2024 at 14:37, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> I think stability in the context of this problem is an abstract term
> especially given the low amount of ARM support for PMUs.
Just stop arguing.
The 'cycles' thing is documented. It's CP:U cycles. This is just a *fact*.
I have now blocked you. You will get no more replies from me, because
it's not worth my time.
I simply have better things to do that deal with people who cannot
accept documented and existing behavior, and spend days arguing that
their broken fix was a "fix".
Just go play in any of the other open source projects that (sadly)
don't have regression rules.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists