[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240528003521.979836-11-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 17:34:56 -0700
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
paulmck@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, mark.rutland@....com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org, raghavendra.kt@....com,
sshegde@...ux.ibm.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/35] entry: irqentry_exit only preempts for TIF_NEED_RESCHED
Use __tif_need_resched(RESCHED_NOW) instead of need_resched() to be
explicit that this path only reschedules if it is needed imminently.
Also, add a comment about why we need a need-resched check here at
all, given that the top level conditional has already checked the
preempt_count().
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Originally-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87jzshhexi.ffs@tglx/
Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
---
kernel/entry/common.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/entry/common.c b/kernel/entry/common.c
index bcb23c866425..c684385921de 100644
--- a/kernel/entry/common.c
+++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
@@ -307,7 +307,16 @@ void raw_irqentry_exit_cond_resched(void)
rcu_irq_exit_check_preempt();
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY))
WARN_ON_ONCE(!on_thread_stack());
- if (need_resched())
+
+ /*
+ * Check if we need to preempt eagerly.
+ *
+ * Note: we need an explicit check here because some
+ * architectures don't fold TIF_NEED_RESCHED in the
+ * preempt_count. For archs that do, this is already covered
+ * in the conditional above.
+ */
+ if (__tif_need_resched(RESCHED_NOW))
preempt_schedule_irq();
}
}
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists