[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240528071446.59197-1-zeming@nfschina.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 15:14:46 +0800
From: Li zeming <zeming@...china.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com,
vschneid@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Li zeming <zeming@...china.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: core: Remove unnecessary ‘NULL’ values from core_rq
core_rq is assigned first, so it does not need to initialize the
assignment.
Signed-off-by: Li zeming <zeming@...china.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index e32fea8f5830..346159a24705 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6485,7 +6485,7 @@ static void sched_core_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu)
static void sched_core_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cpu)
{
const struct cpumask *smt_mask = cpu_smt_mask(cpu);
- struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu), *core_rq = NULL;
+ struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu), *core_rq;
int t;
guard(core_lock)(&cpu);
--
2.18.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists