[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bedeec1d-d4eb-4154-a6f4-21b8d873a416@wolfvision.net>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 10:50:48 +0200
From: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>
To: Chen Ni <nichen@...as.ac.cn>, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com, sam@...nborg.org,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org, tzimmermann@...e.de,
airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch, sre@...nel.org
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panel: sitronix-st7789v: Add check for
of_drm_get_panel_orientation
Hi Chen Ni,
On 5/28/24 05:08, Chen Ni wrote:
> Add check for the return value of of_drm_get_panel_orientation() and
> return the error if it fails in order to catch the error.
>
> Fixes: b27c0f6d208d ("drm/panel: sitronix-st7789v: add panel orientation support")
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ni <nichen@...as.ac.cn>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sitronix-st7789v.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sitronix-st7789v.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sitronix-st7789v.c
> index 88e80fe98112..8b15e225bf37 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sitronix-st7789v.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-sitronix-st7789v.c
> @@ -643,7 +643,9 @@ static int st7789v_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> if (ret)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to get backlight\n");
>
> - of_drm_get_panel_orientation(spi->dev.of_node, &ctx->orientation);
> + ret = of_drm_get_panel_orientation(spi->dev.of_node, &ctx->orientation);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(&spi->dev, ret, "Failed to get orientation\n");
>
> drm_panel_add(&ctx->panel);
I was worried that this effectively makes "rotation" a required property
(although it is not marked required in the bindings documentation) but
it turns out that of_drm_get_panel_orientation handles a missing
"rotation" property gracefully.
Also, all other panel drivers I checked handle the
of_drm_get_panel_orientation call as you suggested. Nice to see this
becoming aligned.
Reviewed-by: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>
Thanks and best regards,
Michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists