[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3e478ecc-33b8-4aa6-b984-67877864e900@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 14:35:27 +0530
From: "Limaye, Aniket" <a-limaye@...com>
To: Manorit Chawdhry <m-chawdhry@...com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh
Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@...com>,
Udit
Kumar <u-kumar1@...com>, Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200*: Add bootph-* properties
Hi Manorit,
Had some comments below:
(Re-sending coz I forgot to change to plain-text formatting and the
mailing-list rejected it)
On 5/7/2024 3:14 PM, Manorit Chawdhry wrote:
> Adds bootph-* properties to the leaf nodes to enable U-boot to
> utilise them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manorit Chawdhry <m-chawdhry@...com>
> ---
> .../boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi | 2 ++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-mcu-wakeup.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-som-p0.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
> 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
> index 6593c5da82c0..f7b96e8d6462 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts
[...]
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi
> index 657f9cc9f4ea..111eba71ed33 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-main.dtsi
> @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ secure_proxy_main: mailbox@...00000 {
> <0x00 0x32800000 0x00 0x100000>;
> interrupt-names = "rx_011";
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 37 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + bootph-all;
> };
>
> hwspinlock: spinlock@...00000 {
> @@ -1538,5 +1539,6 @@ main_esm: esm@...000 {
> compatible = "ti,j721e-esm";
> reg = <0x0 0x700000 0x0 0x1000>;
> ti,esm-pins = <656>, <657>;
> + bootph-all;
Should this be bootph-pre-ram?
> };
> };
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-mcu-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-mcu-wakeup.dtsi
> index 7cf21c99956e..1e346451ee35 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-mcu-wakeup.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-mcu-wakeup.dtsi
> @@ -21,16 +21,19 @@ dmsc: system-controller@...83000 {
Do we need to add bootph-all property to the parent "dmsc" node too?
For some reason, for me, boot is failing without the bootph-all property
in the parent "dmsc" node here, even though it;s added to the child
nodes below
Failing logs with current patch (boot gets stuck) : [0]
If I ONLY add the bootph-all property to the dmsc node as well, the
device boots up just fine.
[0]: https://gist.github.com/aniket-l/a33a2e5d71432f6824310c8658929b40
> k3_pds: power-controller {
> compatible = "ti,sci-pm-domain";
> #power-domain-cells = <2>;
> + bootph-all;
> };
>
> k3_clks: clock-controller {
> compatible = "ti,k2g-sci-clk";
> #clock-cells = <2>;
> + bootph-all;
> };
>
> k3_reset: reset-controller {
> compatible = "ti,sci-reset";
> #reset-cells = <2>;
> + bootph-all;
> };
> };
>
> @@ -45,6 +48,7 @@ mcu_timer0: timer@...00000 {
> assigned-clock-parents = <&k3_clks 35 2>;
> power-domains = <&k3_pds 35 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> ti,timer-pwm;
> + bootph-pre-ram;
> };
>
> mcu_timer1: timer@...10000 {
> @@ -187,6 +191,7 @@ wkup_conf: bus@...00000 {
> chipid: chipid@14 {
> compatible = "ti,am654-chipid";
> reg = <0x14 0x4>;
> + bootph-all;
> };
> };
>
> @@ -347,6 +352,7 @@ mcu_ringacc: ringacc@...00000 {
> ti,sci = <&dmsc>;
> ti,sci-dev-id = <235>;
> msi-parent = <&main_udmass_inta>;
> + bootph-all;
> };
>
> mcu_udmap: dma-controller@...c0000 {
> @@ -371,6 +377,7 @@ mcu_udmap: dma-controller@...c0000 {
> ti,sci-rm-range-rchan = <0x0a>, /* RX_CHAN */
> <0x0b>; /* RX_HCHAN */
> ti,sci-rm-range-rflow = <0x00>; /* GP RFLOW */
> + bootph-all;
> };
> };
>
> @@ -387,6 +394,7 @@ secure_proxy_mcu: mailbox@...80000 {
> * firmware on non-MPU processors
> */
> status = "disabled";
> + bootph-pre-ram;
> };
>
> mcu_cpsw: ethernet@...00000 {
> @@ -530,6 +538,7 @@ hbmc_mux: mux-controller@...00004 {
> reg = <0x00 0x47000004 0x00 0x4>;
> #mux-control-cells = <1>;
> mux-reg-masks = <0x0 0x2>; /* HBMC select */
> + bootph-all;
> };
>
> hbmc: hyperbus@...34000 {
> @@ -648,6 +657,7 @@ wkup_vtm0: temperature-sensor@...40000 {
> <0x00 0x42050000 0x00 0x350>;
> power-domains = <&k3_pds 154 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
> + bootph-all;
Should this be bootph-pre-ram?
> };
>
> mcu_esm: esm@...00000 {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-som-p0.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-som-p0.dtsi
> index 7e6a584ac6f0..a875a79e95c6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-som-p0.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-som-p0.dtsi
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ memory@...00000 {
> /* 4G RAM */
> reg = <0x00 0x80000000 0x00 0x80000000>,
> <0x08 0x80000000 0x00 0x80000000>;
> + bootph-all;
Can you add the right indentation here?
> };
>
> reserved_memory: reserved-memory {
> @@ -120,6 +121,7 @@ J721E_WKUP_IOPAD(0x20, PIN_INPUT, 1) /* (B8) MCU_OSPI0_D5.MCU_HYPERBUS0_DQ5 */
> J721E_WKUP_IOPAD(0x24, PIN_INPUT, 1) /* (A8) MCU_OSPI0_D6.MCU_HYPERBUS0_DQ6 */
> J721E_WKUP_IOPAD(0x28, PIN_INPUT, 1) /* (A7) MCU_OSPI0_D7.MCU_HYPERBUS0_DQ7 */
> >;
> + bootph-all;
> };
>
> mcu_fss0_ospi0_pins_default: mcu-fss0-ospi0-default-pins {
> @@ -136,6 +138,7 @@ J721E_WKUP_IOPAD(0x0024, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* MCU_OSPI0_D6 */
> J721E_WKUP_IOPAD(0x0028, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* MCU_OSPI0_D7 */
> J721E_WKUP_IOPAD(0x0008, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* MCU_OSPI0_DQS */
> >;
> + bootph-all;
> };
> };
>
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists