[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f1d85b54-f0d6-4274-923c-2ad31eab2b19@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 12:24:50 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: "Jason-JH.Lin" <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jason-ch Chen <jason-ch.chen@...iatek.com>,
Singo Chang <singo.chang@...iatek.com>, Nancy Lin <nancy.lin@...iatek.com>,
Shawn Sung <shawn.sung@...iatek.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/8] dt-bindings: mailbox: Add property for CMDQ secure
driver
Il 26/05/24 01:08, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto:
> 1. Add mboxes property to define a GCE loopping thread as a secure IRQ
> handler.
> The CMDQ secure driver requests a mbox channel and sends a looping
> command to the GCE thread. The looping command will wait for a secure
> packet done event signal from secure world and then jump back to the
> first instuction. Each time it waits for an event, it notifies the
> CMDQ driver to perform the same action as the IRQ handler.
>
> 2. Add gce-events property from gce-props.yaml to define a
> secure packet done signal in secure world.
> There are 1024 events IDs for GCE to use to execute instructions in
> the specific event happened. These events could be signaled by HW or SW
> and their value would be different in different SoC because of HW event
> IDs distribution range from 0 to 1023.
> If we set a static event ID: 855 for mt8188, it might be conflict the
> event ID original set in mt8195.
> So we define an event ID that will be set when GCE runs to the end of
> secure cmdq packet in the secure world.
>
> This can reduce the latency of software communication between normal
> world and secure world. In addition, we can also remove the complex
> logic after the secure packet done in the secure world.
>
Hello Jason,
Is this looping thread SoC specific, board specific or firmware specific?
Thanks,
Angelo
> Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hsiao Chien Sung <shawn.sung@...iatek.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml
> index cef9d7601398..6e5e848d61d9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml
> @@ -49,6 +49,10 @@ properties:
> items:
> - const: gce
>
> + mboxes:
> + items:
> + - description: GCE looping thread as a secure IRQ handler
> +
> required:
> - compatible
> - "#mbox-cells"
> @@ -57,6 +61,8 @@ required:
> - clocks
>
> allOf:
> + - $ref: /schemas/mailbox/mediatek,gce-props.yaml#
> +
> - if:
> not:
> properties:
> @@ -67,7 +73,7 @@ allOf:
> required:
> - clock-names
>
> -additionalProperties: false
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
>
> examples:
> - |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists