[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b6fe99f-7fa9-493c-afe7-8e75b7f59852@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 15:18:04 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Chris Packham
<Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>, linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"patches@...ts.linux.dev" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Guenter Roeck
<linux@...ck-us.net>, "shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"patches@...nelci.org" <patches@...nelci.org>,
"lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org" <lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org>,
"pavel@...x.de" <pavel@...x.de>, "f.fainelli@...il.com"
<f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
"srw@...dewatkins.net" <srw@...dewatkins.net>,
"rwarsow@....de" <rwarsow@....de>, "conor@...nel.org" <conor@...nel.org>,
"allen.lkml@...il.com" <allen.lkml@...il.com>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/23] 5.15.160-rc1 review
On 28/05/2024 14:14, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>
>
>> On May 28, 2024, at 5:04 AM, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 25/05/2024 15:20, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 12:13:28AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>> Hi Greg,
>>>>
>>>> On 23/05/2024 14:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.160 release.
>>>>> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>>> let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Responses should be made by Sat, 25 May 2024 13:03:15 +0000.
>>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>>
>>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.160-rc1.gz
>>>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
>>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> greg k-h
>>>>>
>>>>> -------------
>>>>> Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>> NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
>>>>> nfsd: don't allow nfsd threads to be signalled.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am seeing a suspend regression on a couple boards and bisect is pointing
>>>> to the above commit. Reverting this commit does fix the issue.
>>> Ugh, that fixes the report from others. Can you cc: everyone on that
>>> and figure out what is going on, as this keeps going back and forth...
>>
>>
>> Adding Chuck, Neil and Chris from the bug report here [0].
>>
>> With the above applied to v5.15.y, I am seeing suspend on 2 of our boards fail. These boards are using NFS and on entry to suspend I am now seeing ...
>>
>> Freezing of tasks failed after 20.002 seconds (1 tasks refusing to
>> freeze, wq_busy=0):
>>
>> The boards appear to hang at that point. So may be something else missing?
>
> Note that we don't have access to hardware like this, so
> we haven't tested that patch (even the upstream version)
> with suspend on that hardware.
No problem, I would not expect you to have this particular hardware :-)
> So, it could be something missing, or it could be that
> patch has a problem.
>
> It would help us to know if you observe the same issue
> with an upstream kernel, if that is possible.
I don't observe this with either mainline, -next or any other stable
branch. So that would suggest that something else is missing from
linux-5.15.y.
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists