linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/1] ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-i2s: fix LRCLK polarity in i2s mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <665739895996a_26e4f3704a@njaxe.notmuch>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 16:19:53 +0200
From: Matteo Martelli <matteomartelli3@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, 
 Matteo Martelli <matteomartelli3@...il.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, 
 Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, 
 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, 
 Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, 
 Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, 
 Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, 
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, 
 Marcus Cooper <codekipper@...il.com>, 
 Clément Péron <peron.clem@...il.com>, 
 linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
 linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-i2s: fix LRCLK polarity in i2s
 mode

Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 04:00:14PM +0200, Matteo Martelli wrote:
> 
> > I found an issue on the sunxi i2s controller driver while doing some
> > tests with a Pine64 A64 host board and an external codec (ES8311).
> > The A64 i2s controller is compatible with the sun8i-h3-i2s driver.
> > The LRCLK was being inverted when the bus was operated in i2s mode:
> > normally should be left channel on low LRCLK and right channel on high
> > LRCLK, but it was the opposite instead.
> 
> Please don't send cover letters for single patches, if there is anything
> that needs saying put it in the changelog of the patch or after the ---
> if it's administrative stuff.  This reduces mail volume and ensures that 
> any important information is recorded in the changelog rather than being
> lost. 

All right, sorry for that. Should I resend this patch without cover letter?