[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87le3t5pmt.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 10:16:26 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <kernel_team@...ynix.com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <vernhao@...cent.com>,
<mgorman@...hsingularity.net>, <hughd@...gle.com>,
<willy@...radead.org>, <david@...hat.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<luto@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<bp@...en8.de>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <rjgolo@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/12] LUF(Lazy Unmap Flush) reducing tlb numbers
over 90%
Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com> writes:
> On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 07:43:10PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> It has absolutely not been tested nor reviewed enough. <fud>I hope the
>
> It has been tested enough on my side, and it should be reviewed enough
> for sure.
I believe that you have tested and reviewed the patchset by yourself.
But there are some other cases that you haven't thought about enough
before, as Dave pointed out.
So, I suggest you to try to find out more possible weakness of your
patchset. Begin with what Dave and David pointed out.
> I will respin after rebasing the current mm-unstble and
> working on vfs shortly.
>
> Byungchul
>
>> performance gains stick around once more of the bugs are gone.</fud>
--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists