linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: int3472: make common part a separate module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 16:48:26 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Andy Shevchenko" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>, "Daniel Scally" <djrscally@...il.com>,
 "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
 Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
 platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: int3472: make common part a separate module

On Wed, May 29, 2024, at 16:28, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 5:14 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 29, 2024, at 15:41, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 12:50 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nelorg> 
> It's different from the exported namespace.
> The function prefixes are needed due to C language, as we can't have
> two functions named the same. The export OTOH is what used for linking
> modules and if there is no need to have it exported globally, if, for
> example, compiling in this one.
>
> So, can we move to the exported namespace at the same time?

Maybe you can come up with a patch then? I have no idea
which namespace to use here, seeing that there are already
six differnet namespaces in use in drivers/platform/x86/intel/
but none of them seem to be a good fit for this one.

Are you asking to just define another namespace here?
How would I define what the rules about using this namespace
are, and where are they documented?

     Arnd