[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <171699539775.117971.10350524168531143563.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 16:09:57 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: lgirdwood@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
Alina Yu <alina_yu@...htek.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
cy_huang@...htek.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND 0/4] Fix issue when using
devm_of_regulator_put_matches and add compatiblity for both fixed and
adjustable LDO VOUT
On Tue, 28 May 2024 14:01:12 +0800, Alina Yu wrote:
> There are two types of LDO VOUT: fixed voltage mode and adjustable voltage mode.
>
> As the fixed voltage for the LDO is outside the range of the adjustable voltage mode,
> the constraints for this scenario are not suitable to represent both modes.
> Therefore, A property is added to specify the fixed LDO VOUT.
>
> In this version, a software bug has been fixed.
> rtq2208_ldo_match is no longer a local variable.
> It prevents invalid memory access when devm_of_regulator_put_matches is called.
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/4] regulator: rtq2208: Fix invalid memory access when devm_of_regulator_put_matches is called
commit: 72b6a2d6506843375c7b91197f49ef38ca0c6d0f
[2/4] regulator: rtq2208: Fix LDO to be compatible with both fixed and adjustable vout
(no commit info)
[3/4] regulator: rtq2208: Add fixed LDO VOUT property and check that matches the constraints
(no commit info)
[4/4] regulator: dt-bindings: rtq2208: Add specified fixed LDO VOUT property
(no commit info)
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists