lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240529160656.209352-1-yuntao.wang@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 00:06:56 +0800
From: Yuntao Wang <yuntao.wang@...ux.dev>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Yuntao Wang <yuntao.wang@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH] fs/file: fix the check in find_next_fd()

The maximum possible return value of find_next_zero_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits,
maxbit, bitbit) is maxbit. This return value, multiplied by BITS_PER_LONG,
gives the value of bitbit, which can never be greater than maxfd, it can
only be equal to maxfd at most, so the following check 'if (bitbit > maxfd)'
will never be true.

Moreover, when bitbit equals maxfd, it indicates that there are no unused
fds, and the function can directly return.

Fix this check.

Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <yuntao.wang@...ux.dev>
---
 fs/file.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
index 8076aef9c210..7058901a2154 100644
--- a/fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/file.c
@@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ static unsigned int find_next_fd(struct fdtable *fdt, unsigned int start)
 	unsigned int bitbit = start / BITS_PER_LONG;
 
 	bitbit = find_next_zero_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits, maxbit, bitbit) * BITS_PER_LONG;
-	if (bitbit > maxfd)
+	if (bitbit >= maxfd)
 		return maxfd;
 	if (bitbit > start)
 		start = bitbit;
-- 
2.45.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ