[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240529160656.209352-1-yuntao.wang@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 00:06:56 +0800
From: Yuntao Wang <yuntao.wang@...ux.dev>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Yuntao Wang <yuntao.wang@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH] fs/file: fix the check in find_next_fd()
The maximum possible return value of find_next_zero_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits,
maxbit, bitbit) is maxbit. This return value, multiplied by BITS_PER_LONG,
gives the value of bitbit, which can never be greater than maxfd, it can
only be equal to maxfd at most, so the following check 'if (bitbit > maxfd)'
will never be true.
Moreover, when bitbit equals maxfd, it indicates that there are no unused
fds, and the function can directly return.
Fix this check.
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <yuntao.wang@...ux.dev>
---
fs/file.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
index 8076aef9c210..7058901a2154 100644
--- a/fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/file.c
@@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ static unsigned int find_next_fd(struct fdtable *fdt, unsigned int start)
unsigned int bitbit = start / BITS_PER_LONG;
bitbit = find_next_zero_bit(fdt->full_fds_bits, maxbit, bitbit) * BITS_PER_LONG;
- if (bitbit > maxfd)
+ if (bitbit >= maxfd)
return maxfd;
if (bitbit > start)
start = bitbit;
--
2.45.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists