lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 10:30:59 +0800
From: luriwen <tgsp002@...il.com>
To: rafael@...nel.org,
	viresh.kumar@...aro.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	luriwen <luriwen@...in.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v1] cpufreq/cppc: Take policy->cur into judge when set target

There is a case that desired_perf is exactly the same with the old perf,
but the actual current freq is not. Add a judgment condition to return
only when the three values are exactly the same.

This happened in S3 while the cpufreq governor is set to powersave.
During resume process, the CPU frequency is adjusted to the highest
perf. For the booting CPU, there's a warning that "CPU frequency out of
sync", because the policy->cur is the lowest_perf while the actual
current frequency is the highest_perf that obtained via
cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(), then set policy->cur to highest_perf. The
governor->limits() intent to configure the CPU frequency to lowest_perf
and the governor->target() returned because the desired_perf is equal to
cpu->perf_ctrls.desired_perf leaving the actual current frequency and
policy->cur are remain the highest_perf. Add the judgement that whether
policy->cur is the same with desired_perf.

Signed-off-by: luriwen <luriwen@...in.cn>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
index 15f1d41920a3..802f7c7c0ad8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
@@ -296,7 +296,8 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 
 	desired_perf = cppc_khz_to_perf(&cpu_data->perf_caps, target_freq);
 	/* Return if it is exactly the same perf */
-	if (desired_perf == cpu_data->perf_ctrls.desired_perf)
+	if (desired_perf == cpu_data->perf_ctrls.desired_perf &&
+	    desired_perf == policy->cur)
 		return ret;
 
 	cpu_data->perf_ctrls.desired_perf = desired_perf;
-- 
2.25.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ