linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] dt-bindings: counter: Add new ti,am62-eqep compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c2c58229-8623-4765-90ab-9cbc6964ca85@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 12:19:49 -0500
From: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
CC: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>,
        David Lechner
	<david@...hnology.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra
	<vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] dt-bindings: counter: Add new ti,am62-eqep
 compatible

Hi Conor,

On 5/25/24 10:23 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 04:30:32PM -0500, Judith Mendez wrote:
>> On 5/24/24 1:38 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 06:15:10PM -0500, Judith Mendez wrote:
>>>> Add new compatible ti,am62-eqep for TI K3 devices. If a device
>>>> uses this compatible, require power-domains property.
>>>>
>>>> Since there is only one functional and interface clock for eqep,
>>>> clock-names is not really required. The clock-name also changed
>>>> for TI K3 SoCs so make clock-names optional for the new compatible
>>>> since there is only one clock that is routed to the IP.
>>>
>>> Really the clock should be named after the function it has in the IP
>>> block - it looks like "sysoutclk" is more likely the name of the clock
>>> routed to the IP rather than the role it has?
>>
>> It is the name of the clock, though id like to keep sysclkout for
>> backwards compatibility, even though the name is confusing.
> 
> FWIW, I was not suggesting that it be renamed.

Understood, thanks.

> 
> Thanks,
> Conor.