[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e7a8541a-ec36-495b-880a-2761ae973275@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 10:32:14 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Iwona Winiarska <iwona.winiarska@...el.com>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] peci, hwmon: Switch to new Intel CPU model defines
On 5/29/24 10:19, Tony Luck wrote:
> Update peci subsystem to use the same vendor-family-model
> combined definition that core x86 code uses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> ---
> TIP tree applied the patches that implement the new CPU model number
> macros (and a couple of dozen patches to arch/x86/ files too). So
> v6.10-rc1 has all the necesary code to apply patches to other trees in
> this cycle.
>
> The previous posting of this patch[1] had a tiny bit of fuzz due to
> nearby changes in drivers/peci/internal.h. This one applies cleanly
> to v6.10-rc1.
>
> Iwona, Jean, Guenter: Can you check that it still looks good. If so
> apply it to your tree and kick the process in gear to have it appear in
> the intel-next tree with eventual merge to Linus in next merge window.
>
lgtm
For hwmon:
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
.. assuming this is going to be merged through the peci tree.
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists