[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <80b08de1-fa61-4c20-aad9-1844d2303df7@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 10:44:01 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Babu Moger
<babu.moger@....com>, Maciej Wieczór-Retman
<maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, "Shuah
Khan" <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/16] selftests/resctrl: Use correct type for pids
Hi Ilpo,
On 5/20/24 5:30 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> A few functions receive PIDs through int arguments. PIDs variables
> should be of type pid_t, not int.
>
> Convert pid arguments from int to pid_t.
>
This looks good to me. A couple of places remain that treat
pid_t as int ... that is via the %d format specifier
used to do the printing in print_results_cache() as well as
print_results_bw(). I understand we do not see any warnings
since these are indeed int. So, I wonder if an explicit (int) cast
would not make things obvious and match the stated goal of
not treating pid_t as int?
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists