linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] perf pmus: Sort/merge/aggregate PMUs like mrvl_ddr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 12:24:21 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
	Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
	Tuan Phan <tuanphan@...amperecomputing.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@...vell.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Bhaskara Budiredla <bbudiredla@...vell.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] perf pmus: Sort/merge/aggregate PMUs like mrvl_ddr_pmu

On Tue, 14 May 2024 23:01:12 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> The mrvl_ddr_pmu is uncore and has a hexadecimal address
> suffix. Current PMU sorting/merging code assumes uncore PMU names
> start with uncore_ and have a decimal suffix. Add support for
> hexadecimal suffixes and add tests.
> 
> v6. Add necessary fix in pmu.c to perf_pmu__match_ignoring_suffix that
>     also needs to ignore hex suffixes.
> v5. In pmus.h remove needless addition of #include list.h but add
>     stddef.h for size_t.
> v4. Workaround GCC build error by using unsigned types. Don't consider
>     short hex suffixes as suffixes (e.g. cpum_cf) and test this
>     behavior.
> v3. Rebase and move tests from pmus.c to the existing pmu.c.
> 
> [...]

Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!

Best regards,
-- 
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>