linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ice: irdma hardware init failed after suspend/resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 11:17:50 +0800
From: En-Wei WU <en-wei.wu@...onical.com>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Cc: jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, 
	rickywu0421@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, 
	anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, 
	pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] ice: irdma hardware init failed after suspend/resume

Thanks for your kind and quick reply.

> I think this should be called later in the reset path IMO.
> You should call ice_deinit_rdma in ice_prepare_for_reset (replace ice_unplug_aux_dev),
I'm afraid this would break the existing code because in
ice_deinit_rdma(), it will remove some entries in
pf->irq_tracker.entries. And in ice_reinit_interrupt_scheme() (which
is called before ice_prepare_for_reset), some entries have been
allocated for other irq usage.

> What effect does this have on resume time?
When we call ice_init_rdma() at resume time, it will allocate entries
at pf->irq_tracker.entries and update pf->msix_entries for later use
(request_irq) by irdma.

On Tue, 28 May 2024 at 19:12, Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de> wrote:
>
> Dear Ricky,
>
>
> Thank you for your patch. Some minor nits. It’d be great if you made the
> summary about the action and not an issue description. Maybe:
>
> Avoid IRQ collision to fix init failure on ACPI S3 resume
>
> Am 28.05.24 um 12:03 schrieb Ricky Wu:
> > A bug in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218906 describes
> > that irdma would break and report hardware initialization failed after
> > suspend/resume with Intel E810 NIC (tested on 6.9.0-rc5).
> >
> > The problem is caused due to the collision between the irq numbers
> > requested in irdma and the irq numbers requested in other drivers
> > after suspend/resume.
> >
> > The irq numbers used by irdma are derived from ice's ice_pf->msix_entries
> > which stores mappings between MSI-X index and Linux interrupt number.
> > It's supposed to be cleaned up when suspend and rebuilt in resume but
> > it's not, causing irdma using the old irq numbers stored in the old
> > ice_pf->msix_entries to request_irq() when resume. And eventually
> > collide with other drivers.
> >
> > This patch fixes this problem. On suspend, we call ice_deinit_rdma() to
> > clean up the ice_pf->msix_entries (and free the MSI-X vectors used by
> > irdma if we've dynamically allocated them). On Resume, we call
>
> resume
>
> > ice_init_rdma() to rebuild the ice_pf->msix_entries (and allocate the
> > MSI-X vectors if we would like to dynamically allocate them).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ricky Wu <en-wei.wu@...onical.com>
>
> Please add a Link: tag.
>
> If this was tested by somebody else, please also add a Tested-by: line.
>
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 6 +++++-
> >   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
> > index f60c022f7960..ec3cbadaa162 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
> > @@ -5544,7 +5544,7 @@ static int ice_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >        */
> >       disabled = ice_service_task_stop(pf);
> >
> > -     ice_unplug_aux_dev(pf);
> > +     ice_deinit_rdma(pf);
> >
> >       /* Already suspended?, then there is nothing to do */
> >       if (test_and_set_bit(ICE_SUSPENDED, pf->state)) {
> > @@ -5624,6 +5624,10 @@ static int ice_resume(struct device *dev)
> >       if (ret)
> >               dev_err(dev, "Cannot restore interrupt scheme: %d\n", ret);
> >
> > +     ret = ice_init_rdma(pf);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             dev_err(dev, "Reinitialize RDMA during resume failed: %d\n", ret);
> > +
> >       clear_bit(ICE_DOWN, pf->state);
> >       /* Now perform PF reset and rebuild */
> >       reset_type = ICE_RESET_PFR;
>
> What effect does this have on resume time?
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul