lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 17:50:50 -0700
From: Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>
To: Kairui Song <ryncsn@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>, 
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: swap: swap cluster switch to double link list

On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 3:27 PM Chris Li <chriscli@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > @@ -670,7 +562,8 @@ static bool scan_swap_map_try_ssd_cluster(struct swap_info_struct *si,
> > >                         goto new_cluster;
> > >                 } else
> > >                         return false;
> > > -       }
> > > +       } else
> > > +               ci = si->cluster_info + tmp;
> >
> > This "else ci = ..." seems wrong, tmp is not an array index, and not
> > needed either.
>
> Yes, there is a bug there, pointed out by OPPO as well. It should be
> ci = si->cluster_info + (tmp/ SWAPFILE_CLUSTER);
>
> "tmp" is needed because "tmp" or " cluster->next[order]" keep track of
> the current cluster allocation offset,
> in the per cpu cluster struct.

Hi Kairui,


Actually, you are right, the "ci" is not used here. That is why that
ci out of bound error does not trigger kernel OOPS.
We can delete that else line completely.

Chris

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ