[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y17tktze.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 08:39:25 +0206
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Xiang Gao <gxxa03070307@...il.com>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, senozhatsky@...omium.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fengqi@...omi.com, xiaoa
<gaoxiang19870307@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Increase PRINTK_PREFIX_MAX and the buf size in
print_caller.
On 2024-05-27, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> If you need to modify the code to add the extra info, you could also
> modify the buffer size.
Exactly this. Your out-of-tree patch to add extra info should also make
the necessary changes to the buffer sizes. It is your out-of-tree patch
that is broken, not mainline Linux.
John Ogness
Powered by blists - more mailing lists