linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: split the non-PD schema for GCC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9a1bbcbd-7f46-4266-8f08-5650a42234d4@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 09:34:22 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
 Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: split the non-PD schema
 for GCC

On 28/05/2024 22:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On some of Qualcomm platforms the Global Clock Controller (GCC) doesn't
> provide power domains. Split no-PD version from the common qcom,gcc schema.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> ---


> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml
> index 788825105f24..e7ec15b1780d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml
> @@ -14,27 +14,14 @@ description: |
>    Common bindings for Qualcomm global clock control module providing the
>    clocks, resets and power domains.
>  
> -properties:
> -  '#clock-cells':
> -    const: 1
> -
> -  '#reset-cells':
> -    const: 1
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: qcom,gcc-nopd.yaml
>  
> +properties:
>    '#power-domain-cells':
>      const: 1

So what's left here? One property? Not much benefit. Triple-schema
(include something to include something) does not make it readable. Just
do not require power-domain-cells in qcom,gcc.yaml.


Best regards,
Krzysztof