[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHVXubgBDxyow3-CFwBrkJ7xoAXCv8Tq7nNTAcvbzbA=TAaf5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 10:04:14 +0200
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
To: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Leonardo Bras <leobras@...hat.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] riscv: Implement xchg8/16() using Zabha
Hi Andrea,
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 8:00 PM Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > -#define __arch_xchg_masked(prepend, append, r, p, n) \
> > +#define __arch_xchg_masked(swap_sfx, prepend, append, r, p, n) \
>
> This actually indicates a problem in the current (aka, no Zabha)
> implementation: without your series, xchg16() gets mapped to
>
> lr.w a2,(a3)
> and a1,a2,a5
> or a1,a1,a4
> sc.w a1,a1,(a3)
> bnez a1,43c <.L0^B1>
>
> which is clearly wrong... (other "fully-ordered LR/SC sequences"
> instead follow the mapping
>
> lr.w a2,(a3)
> and a1,a2,a5
> or a1,a1,a4
> sc.w.rl a1,a1,(a3)
> bnez a1,43c <.L0^B1>
> fence rw,rw )
>
> A similar consideration for xchg8().
Ok, I will fix that separately and make it merged in -rc2.
Thanks,
Akex
>
> Andrea
Powered by blists - more mailing lists