linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 0/6] Fix rtq2208 BUCK ramp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <171698167685.48637.16421950159678446451.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 12:21:16 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: lgirdwood@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, 
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
 Alina Yu <alina_yu@...htek.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
 johnny_lai@...htek.com, cy_huang@...htek.com
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v3 0/6] Fix rtq2208 BUCK ramp_delay and LDO
 dvs setting

On Fri, 10 May 2024 20:06:19 +0800, Alina Yu wrote:
> This series patches is for hardware modification of RTQ2208.
> ramp_delay range of BUCK is changed.
> The maximum ramp up and down range of BUCK are shorten
>  from 64mVstep/us to 16mVstep/us.
> The LDO's Vout is adjustable if the hardware setting allow it,
> and it can be set either 1800mv or 3300mv.
> Additionally, the discharge register has been moved to another position.
> In this version, a software bug has been fixed.
> rtq2208_ldo_match is no longer a local variable.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/6] regulator: rtq2208: Fix invalid memory access when devm_of_regulator_put_matches is called
      commit: 72b6a2d6506843375c7b91197f49ef38ca0c6d0f

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark