linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kbuild: verify dtoverlay files against schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 08:21:40 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, 
	Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: verify dtoverlay files against schema

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 6:31 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 10:16 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
> <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 28 May 2024 at 16:15, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 6:34 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
> > > <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Currently only the single part device trees are validated against DT
> > > > schema. For the multipart schema files only the first file is validated.
> > >
> > > What do you mean by multipart schema files? Did you mean multipart DTs
> > > (i.e. base plus overlays)?
> >
> > Yes, multipart DT files, dts + dtso => dtb + dtbo => final dtb
> >
> > >
> > > Looks good otherwise and I can fix that up.
> >
> > Awesome, thanks!
>
>
>
>
> This looks equivalent to the former patch rejected by Rob Herring:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240225151209.343160-1-alexander.stein@mailbox.org/
>
>
>
> Did he change his mind since then?

I think I misinterpreted the prior one to be checking just overlays
rather than base+overlay seeing the 'dtbo' in it.

Of the 2, this patch seems a bit cleaner.

Rob