linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH wireless-next 4/8] wifi: wlcore: pass "status" to wlcore_hw_convert_fw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZlcuNxmpMlHOMPXL@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 14:31:35 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: "Nemanov, Michael" <michael.nemanov@...com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-next 4/8] wifi: wlcore: pass "status" to
 wlcore_hw_convert_fw_status()

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 04:15:13PM +0300, Nemanov, Michael wrote:
> On 5/28/2024 12:17 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ static int wlcore_fw_status(struct wl1271 *wl, struct wl_fw_status *status)
> >    	if (ret < 0)
> >    		return ret;
> > -	wlcore_hw_convert_fw_status(wl, wl->raw_fw_status, wl->fw_status);
> > +	wlcore_hw_convert_fw_status(wl, wl->raw_fw_status, status);
> >    	wl1271_debug(DEBUG_IRQ, "intr: 0x%x (fw_rx_counter = %d, "
> >    		     "drv_rx_counter = %d, tx_results_counter = %d)",
> > -- 
> > 2.30.2
> 
> Agree this is more consistent. Maybe *status shouldn't be an argument to
> wlcore_fw_status at all? It's called only in one place with wl->fw_status
> anyway.

I did consider that, and if we removed the argument, it would make sense
to add a local "status" variable at the top of this function anyway,
otherwise endlessly referring to wl->fw_status.foo instead of
status->foo becomes quite tiring and needlessly verbose (which means
less readable.)

That's something which could be done as a separate patch.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!