linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND Patch v13 2/3] media: rockchip: Add a driver for Rockchip's camera interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <VOV9ES.1808A7M5SYMM3@packett.cool>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 21:22:07 -0300
From: Val Packett <val@...kett.cool>
To: Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait.k@...il.com>
Cc: mchehab@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
	alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com,
	paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com, michael.riesch@...fvision.net,
	laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND Patch v13 2/3] media: rockchip: Add a driver for
 Rockchip's camera interface

Hi,

On Sun, Feb 11 2024 at 20:03:31 +01:00:00, Mehdi Djait 
<mehdi.djait.k@...il.com> wrote:
> This introduces a V4L2 driver for the Rockchip CIF video capture 
> controller.
> 
> This controller can be found on RK3066, PX30, RK1808, RK3128 and 
> RK3288,
> but for now it's only been tested on the PX30.

I've been testing it on an RK3066 tablet I'm bringing up mainline on, 
recently figured out the clock situation that made the cameras appear 
on I2C and got a camera driver to attach, but still not getting a frame 
and will need to debug more.. Since you're familiar with the hardware, 
could you quickly tell me what exactly causes the CIF interrupt to 
fire? Is it a signal from the camera?

Anyway, two things I noticed with the code:

> +static int cif_enum_input(struct file *file, void *priv,
> +			  struct v4l2_input *input)
> +{
> +	struct cif_stream *stream = video_drvdata(file);
> +	struct v4l2_subdev *sd = stream->cifdev->remote.sd;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (input->index > 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sd, video, g_input_status, &input->status);
> +	if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
> +		return ret;

v4l2_subdev_call actually returns -ENOIOCTLCMD when the camera driver 
does not handle the requested call.

> +static int cif_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
[…]
> +	ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, cif_dev->match_data->clks_num,
> +				cif_dev->match_data->clks);

This looks like it's just modifying the `static` clocks array shared 
between all instances of the driver and not copying the clock 
references into the instance's private struct.

Thanks,
~val