[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a72eaf6-d750-4898-be75-6c27512750b1@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 16:10:04 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, "Wieczor-Retman, Maciej"
<maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>, Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, "Drew
Fustini" <dfustini@...libre.com>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "patches@...ts.linux.dev"
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 00/20] Add support for Sub-NUMA cluster (SNC) systems
Hi Tony,
On 5/30/24 3:49 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> btw ... the static checker I ran did have four other complaints, three about
>> uninitialized data and one about divide by zero. Most problems appear to be
>> in mbm_update() that does not initialize rr.sumdomains nor rr.ci before
>> calling __mon_event_count().
>>
>> Please use available tools to check code before posting.
>
> Which static checker? I tried smatch and it only finds one:
I used coverity this time.
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists