linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu: Make iommu_sva_domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fdc3bffa-7149-48a4-949a-dd469c6c2726@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 14:22:04 +0530
From: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@....com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
 Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
 Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu: Make iommu_sva_domain_alloc() static

Hi Lu,

On 5/28/2024 10:24 AM, Lu Baolu wrote:
> iommu_sva_domain_alloc() is only called in iommu-sva.c, hence make it
> static.
> 
> On the other hand, iommu_sva_domain_alloc() should not return NULL anymore
> after commit <80af5a452024> ("iommu: Add ops->domain_alloc_sva()"), the
> removal of inline code avoids potential confusion.
> 
> Fixes: 80af5a452024 ("iommu: Add ops->domain_alloc_sva()")
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/iommu.h     | 8 --------
>  drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c | 6 ++++--
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> index 7bc8dff7cf6d..5cdd3d41b87b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -1527,8 +1527,6 @@ struct iommu_sva *iommu_sva_bind_device(struct device *dev,
>  					struct mm_struct *mm);
>  void iommu_sva_unbind_device(struct iommu_sva *handle);
>  u32 iommu_sva_get_pasid(struct iommu_sva *handle);
> -struct iommu_domain *iommu_sva_domain_alloc(struct device *dev,
> -					    struct mm_struct *mm);
>  #else
>  static inline struct iommu_sva *
>  iommu_sva_bind_device(struct device *dev, struct mm_struct *mm)
> @@ -1553,12 +1551,6 @@ static inline u32 mm_get_enqcmd_pasid(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  }
>  
>  static inline void mm_pasid_drop(struct mm_struct *mm) {}
> -
> -static inline struct iommu_domain *
> -iommu_sva_domain_alloc(struct device *dev, struct mm_struct *mm)
> -{
> -	return NULL;
> -}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_IOMMU_SVA */
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_IOPF
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c
> index 18a35e798b72..25e581299226 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>  #include "iommu-priv.h"
>  
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(iommu_sva_lock);
> +static struct iommu_domain *iommu_sva_domain_alloc(struct device *dev,
> +						   struct mm_struct *mm);

If we move move iommu_sva_domain_alloc() before iommu_sva_bind_device() then we
can avoid this forward declaration.

-Vasant