linux-kernel - Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/topology/amd: Evaluate SMT in CPUID leaf 0x8000001e only on family 0x17 and greater

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240530085914.GAZlg_4lcZIaa83jVb@fat_crate.local>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 10:59:14 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Christian Heusel <christian@...sel.eu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/topology/amd: Evaluate SMT in CPUID leaf
 0x8000001e only on family 0x17 and greater

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 12:40:50AM +0200, Christian Heusel wrote:
> it seems like somehow the patch has lost the following two trailers
> compared to the list variant[0] while being applied:
> 
>     Bisected-by: Christian Heusel <christian@...sel.eu>
>     Cc: regressions@...ts.linux.dev
> 
> Did that happen on purpose or did some scripts fail?

Well, we don't add unknown tags because it was getting unwieldy and
Bisected-by is not really one we do. I can offer

	Reported-by: Christian Heusel <christian@...sel.eu>

as bisection is important work and it should be documented.

How does that sound?

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette