[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240530010245.GA66154@system.software.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 10:02:45 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel_team@...ynix.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vernhao@...cent.com,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, hughd@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org,
david@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, luto@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, rjgolo@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/12] LUF(Lazy Unmap Flush) reducing tlb numbers
over 90%
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:16:26AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com> writes:
>
> > On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 07:43:10PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >> It has absolutely not been tested nor reviewed enough. <fud>I hope the
> >
> > It has been tested enough on my side, and it should be reviewed enough
> > for sure.
>
> I believe that you have tested and reviewed the patchset by yourself.
> But there are some other cases that you haven't thought about enough
> before, as Dave pointed out.
>
> So, I suggest you to try to find out more possible weakness of your
> patchset. Begin with what Dave and David pointed out.
I will.
Byungchul
> > I will respin after rebasing the current mm-unstble and
> > working on vfs shortly.
> >
> > Byungchul
> >
> >> performance gains stick around once more of the bugs are gone.</fud>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists