linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH wireless-next 6/8] wifi: wlcore: add pn16 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <24be3582-1b2d-4f94-9a16-26ab70da36b8@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 15:46:18 +0300
From: "Nemanov, Michael" <michael.nemanov@...com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>, Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-next 6/8] wifi: wlcore: add pn16 support

On 5/30/2024 3:25 PM, Nemanov, Michael wrote:
[...]

> 
> On 5/30/2024 11:20 AM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> [...]
>> > The original code was > tx_lnk_free_pkts = 
>> status->counters.tx_lnk_free_pkts[i]; > diff = (tx_lnk_free_pkts - 
>> lnk->prev_freed_pkts) & 0xff; > > if (diff == 0) > continue; > > I 
>> wonder if comparing tx_lnk_free_pkts to 0 was added intentionally? 
>> This is > monotonously incremented counter so 0 is not significant, 
>> unlike the diff. > Have I missed something? You are... While you're 

[...]

And sorry for making a mess of the quoted text on the previous message, 
got it sorted now.

Michael.