linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 4/5] net: phy: mediatek: Extend 1G TX/RX link pulse time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zlik7TfUsOanlBMV@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 17:10:21 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: SkyLake Huang (黃啟澤) <SkyLake.Huang@...iatek.com>
Cc: "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
	"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dqfext@...il.com" <dqfext@...il.com>,
	Steven Liu (劉人豪) <steven.liu@...iatek.com>,
	"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	"daniel@...rotopia.org" <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
	"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com" <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 4/5] net: phy: mediatek: Extend 1G TX/RX link
 pulse time

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 04:01:08PM +0000, SkyLake Huang (黃啟澤) wrote:
> I'm not going to handle timeout case here. If we can't detect
> MTK_PHY_FINAL_SPEED_1000 in 1 second, let it go and we'll detect it
> next round.

With this waiting up to one second for MTK_PHY_FINAL_SPEED_1000 to be
set...

> > > +int mtk_gphy_cl22_read_status(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > > +{
> > > +int ret;
> > > +
> > > +ret = genphy_read_status(phydev);
> > > +if (ret)
> > > +return ret;
> > > +
> > > +if (phydev->autoneg == AUTONEG_ENABLE && !phydev-
> > >autoneg_complete) {

Are you sure you want this condition like this? When the link is down,
and 1G speeds are being advertised, it means that you'll call
extend_an_new_lp_cnt_limit(). If MTK_PHY_FINAL_SPEED_1000 doesn't get
set, that'll take one second each and every time we poll the PHY for
its status - which will be done while holding phydev->lock.

This doesn't sound very good.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!