linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/16] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: reference qcom-gcc.yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 20:39:31 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, 
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>, 
	Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>, Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>, 
	Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>, Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, 
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: reference qcom-gcc.yaml

On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 31/05/2024 17:14, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 03:52:18PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Unify Qualcomm clock controllers by referencing qcom,gcc.yaml where
> >> applicable.  Several existing bindings for these display/GPU/CAM clock
> >> controllers already do it.
> >
> > The series looks good to me with a single point in mind. You are writing
> > that dispcc/videocc/etc are a variant of GCC. However GCC is a Global
> > Clock Controller.
>
> Yeah, that's simplification from my side and assumption that at first
> they designed GCC and then they copied the design to other blocks.
>
> > What about renaming qcom,gcc.yaml to
> > qcom,cc-common.yaml ? Then the rest makes total sense to me.
>
> Several gpu/disp/cam clock controllers already include qcom,gcc.yaml, so
> I would say this should not be a requirement for this patchset.
>
> We can rename, although it always is a bit of churn - git log needs
> special option, backporting is a bit trickier.

Ok. For the series:

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry