| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 13:16:40 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im@...sung.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
gost.dev@...sung.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeuk Kim <jeuk20.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ufs: pci: Add support MCQ for QEMU-based UFS
On 5/31/24 03:38, Minwoo Im wrote:
> +static int ufs_redhat_get_hba_mac(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> + return MAX_SUPP_MAC;
> +}
Why the prefix "ufs_redhat" instead of "ufs_qemu"?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists