linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] ufs: pci: Add support MCQ for QEMU-based UFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6052a799-88c4-4efa-a59e-d560a091a5a0@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 13:16:40 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im@...sung.com>,
 "James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
 "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
 gost.dev@...sung.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeuk Kim <jeuk20.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ufs: pci: Add support MCQ for QEMU-based UFS

On 5/31/24 03:38, Minwoo Im wrote:
> +static int ufs_redhat_get_hba_mac(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> +	return MAX_SUPP_MAC;
> +}

Why the prefix "ufs_redhat" instead of "ufs_qemu"?

Thanks,

Bart.