linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] ufs: pci: Add support MCQ for QEMU-based UFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 05:54:03 +0900
From: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im@...sung.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, Alim Akhtar
	<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
	gost.dev@...sung.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeuk Kim <jeuk20.kim@...sung.com>, Minwoo Im
	<minwoo.im@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ufs: pci: Add support MCQ for QEMU-based UFS

On 24-05-31 13:16:40, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 5/31/24 03:38, Minwoo Im wrote:
> > +static int ufs_redhat_get_hba_mac(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> > +{
> > +	return MAX_SUPP_MAC;
> > +}
> 
> Why the prefix "ufs_redhat" instead of "ufs_qemu"?

I thouogh I had to use the same name pattern as ufs_intel_* for the name of
vendor ID of the PCI device.  I will update it in the next version.

Thanks for the review.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.
>