linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the drm-xe tree with the drm-intel tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 13:18:35 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>, Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: DRM XE List <intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Balasubramani Vivekanandan
 <balasubramani.vivekanandan@...el.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Michal Wajdeczko
 <michal.wajdeczko@...el.com>, Radhakrishna Sripada
 <radhakrishna.sripada@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-xe tree with the drm-intel tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-xe tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c

between commit:

  ca5d5ecbb90d ("drm/xe/bmg: Enable the display support")

from the drm-intel tree and commit:

  37ea1aee18e7 ("drm/xe: Drop undesired prefix from the platform name")

from the drm-xe tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
index d6859108cc69,e84da0cbb8e9..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c
@@@ -341,8 -342,7 +342,8 @@@ static const struct xe_device_desc lnl_
  
  static const struct xe_device_desc bmg_desc __maybe_unused = {
  	DGFX_FEATURES,
- 	PLATFORM(XE_BATTLEMAGE),
+ 	PLATFORM(BATTLEMAGE),
 +	.has_display = true,
  	.require_force_probe = true,
  };
  

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped