linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v16 2/5] random: add vgetrandom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240531035917.GD6505@sol.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 20:59:17 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org>,
	Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>,
	Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <dhildenb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 2/5] random: add vgetrandom_alloc() syscall

On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 02:19:51PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> +/**
> + * sys_vgetrandom_alloc - Allocate opaque states for use with vDSO getrandom().
> + *
> + * @num:	   On input, a pointer to a suggested hint of how many states to
> + * 		   allocate, and on return the number of states actually allocated.
> + *
> + * @size_per_each: On input, must be zero. On return, the size of each state allocated,
> + * 		   so that the caller can split up the returned allocation into
> + * 		   individual states.
> + *
> + * @addr:	   Reserved, must be zero.
> + *
> + * @flags:	   Reserved, must be zero.
> + *
> + * The getrandom() vDSO function in userspace requires an opaque state, which
> + * this function allocates by mapping a certain number of special pages into
> + * the calling process. It takes a hint as to the number of opaque states
> + * desired, and provides the caller with the number of opaque states actually
> + * allocated, the size of each one in bytes, and the address of the first
> + * state, which may be split up into @num states of @size_per_each bytes each,
> + * by adding @size_per_each to the returned first state @num times, while
> + * ensuring that no single state straddles a page boundary.
> + *
> + * Returns the address of the first state in the allocation on success, or a
> + * negative error value on failure.
> + *
> + * The returned address of the first state may be passed to munmap(2) with a
> + * length of `(size_t)num * (size_t)size_per_each`, in order to deallocate the
> + * memory, after which it is invalid to pass it to vDSO getrandom().

Wouldn't a munmap with '(size_t)num * (size_t)size_per_each' be potentially too
short, due to how the allocation is sized such that states don't cross page
boundaries?

- Eric