[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240531043038.3370793-9-nikunj@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 10:00:22 +0530
From: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <thomas.lendacky@....com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <mingo@...hat.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
<pgonda@...gle.com>, <seanjc@...gle.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
<nikunj@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 08/24] virt: sev-guest: Take mutex in snp_send_guest_request()
SNP command mutex is used to serialize access to the shared buffer, command
handling and message sequence number races.
As part of the preparation for moving SEV guest driver common code and
making mutex private, take the mutex in snp_send_guest_request() instead of
snp_guest_ioctl(). This will result in locking behavior change as detailed
below:
Current locking behaviour:
snp_guest_ioctl()
mutex_lock(&snp_cmd_mutex)
get_report()/get_derived_key()/get_ext_report()
snp_send_guest_request()
...
mutex_unlock(&snp_cmd_mutex)
New locking behaviour:
snp_guest_ioctl()
get_report()/get_derived_key()/get_ext_report()
snp_send_guest_request()
guard(mutex)(&snp_cmd_mutex)
...
Remove multiple lockdep check in the sev-guest driver as they are redundant
now.
Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com>
---
drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c | 17 ++---------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c b/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c
index 0729d0b73495..19ee85fcfd08 100644
--- a/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c
+++ b/drivers/virt/coco/sev-guest/sev-guest.c
@@ -111,8 +111,6 @@ static u64 snp_get_msg_seqno(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev)
{
u64 count;
- lockdep_assert_held(&snp_cmd_mutex);
-
count = snp_dev->secrets->os_area.msg_seqno[snp_dev->vmpck_id] + 1;
/*
@@ -334,6 +332,8 @@ static int snp_send_guest_request(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev, struct snp_gues
u64 seqno;
int rc;
+ guard(mutex)(&snp_cmd_mutex);
+
/* Get message sequence and verify that its a non-zero */
seqno = snp_get_msg_seqno(snp_dev);
if (!seqno)
@@ -388,8 +388,6 @@ static int get_report(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev, struct snp_guest_request_io
struct snp_report_resp *report_resp;
int rc, resp_len;
- lockdep_assert_held(&snp_cmd_mutex);
-
if (!arg->req_data || !arg->resp_data)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -436,8 +434,6 @@ static int get_derived_key(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev, struct snp_guest_reque
/* Response data is 64 bytes and max authsize for GCM is 16 bytes. */
u8 buf[64 + 16];
- lockdep_assert_held(&snp_cmd_mutex);
-
if (!arg->req_data || !arg->resp_data)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -488,8 +484,6 @@ static int get_ext_report(struct snp_guest_dev *snp_dev, struct snp_guest_reques
sockptr_t certs_address;
int ret, resp_len;
- lockdep_assert_held(&snp_cmd_mutex);
-
if (sockptr_is_null(io->req_data) || sockptr_is_null(io->resp_data))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -585,12 +579,9 @@ static long snp_guest_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long
if (!input.msg_version)
return -EINVAL;
- mutex_lock(&snp_cmd_mutex);
-
/* Check if the VMPCK is not empty */
if (is_vmpck_empty(snp_dev)) {
dev_err_ratelimited(snp_dev->dev, "VMPCK is disabled\n");
- mutex_unlock(&snp_cmd_mutex);
return -ENOTTY;
}
@@ -615,8 +606,6 @@ static long snp_guest_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long
break;
}
- mutex_unlock(&snp_cmd_mutex);
-
if (input.exitinfo2 && copy_to_user(argp, &input, sizeof(input)))
return -EFAULT;
@@ -705,8 +694,6 @@ static int sev_report_new(struct tsm_report *report, void *data)
if (!buf)
return -ENOMEM;
- guard(mutex)(&snp_cmd_mutex);
-
/* Check if the VMPCK is not empty */
if (is_vmpck_empty(snp_dev)) {
dev_err_ratelimited(snp_dev->dev, "VMPCK is disabled\n");
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists