[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6d81694-c321-470e-8b53-dcdf24d67c9b@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 10:21:39 +0530
From: Anand Khoje <anand.a.khoje@...cle.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rama.nichanamatlu@...cle.com, manjunath.b.patil@...cle.com,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] RDMA/mlx5: Release CPU for other processes in
mlx5_free_cmd_msg()
On 5/30/24 22:44, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 09:02:56AM +0530, Anand Khoje wrote:
>> In non FLR context, at times CX-5 requests release of ~8 million device pages.
>> This needs humongous number of cmd mailboxes, which to be released once
>> the pages are reclaimed. Release of humongous number of cmd mailboxes
>> consuming cpu time running into many secs, with non preemptable kernels
>> is leading to critical process starving on that cpu’s RQ. To alleviate
>> this, this patch relinquishes cpu periodically but conditionally.
>>
>> Orabug: 36275016
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anand Khoje <anand.a.khoje@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cmd.c | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cmd.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cmd.c
>> index 9c21bce..9fbf25d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cmd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/cmd.c
>> @@ -1336,16 +1336,23 @@ static struct mlx5_cmd_msg *mlx5_alloc_cmd_msg(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev,
>> return ERR_PTR(err);
>> }
>>
>> +#define RESCHED_MSEC 2
>> static void mlx5_free_cmd_msg(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev,
>> struct mlx5_cmd_msg *msg)
>> {
>> struct mlx5_cmd_mailbox *head = msg->next;
>> struct mlx5_cmd_mailbox *next;
>> + unsigned long start_time = jiffies;
>>
>> while (head) {
>> next = head->next;
>> free_cmd_box(dev, head);
> Did you consider to make this function asynchronous and parallel?
>
> Thanks
Hi Leon,
Thanks for reviewing this patch.
Here, all page related methods
give_pages/reclaim_pages/release_all_pages are executed in a worker
thread through pages_work_handler().
Doesn't that mean it is already asynchronous?
When the worker thread, in this case it is processing reclaim_pages(),
is taking a long time - it is starving other processes on the processor
that it is running on. Oracle UEK being a non-preemptible kernel, these
other processes that are getting starved do not get CPU until the worker
relinquishes the CPU. This applies to even processes that are time
critical and high priority. These processes when starved of CPU for a
long time, trigger a kernel panic.
Hence, this patch implements a time based relinquish of CPU using
cond_resched().
Shay Dori, had a suggestion to tune the time (which we have made 2
msec), to reduce too frequent context switching and find a balance in
processing of these mailbox objects. I am presently running some tests
on the basis of this suggestion.
Thanks,
Anand
>> head = next;
>> + if (time_after(jiffies, start_time + msecs_to_jiffies(RESCHED_MSEC))) {
>> + mlx5_core_warn_rl(dev, "Spent more than %d msecs, yielding CPU\n", RESCHED_MSEC);
>> + cond_resched();
>> + start_time = jiffies;
>> + }
>> }
>> kfree(msg);
>> }
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists