[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZlmQ3_wcL3cgp4Hb@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 11:57:03 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@...il.com>,
Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
christian.koenig@....com, alexander.deucher@....com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/resource: optimize find_next_iomem_res
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 10:36:57PM -0700, Chia-I Wu wrote:
> We can skip children resources when the parent resource does not cover
> the range.
>
> This should help vmf_insert_* users on x86, such as several DRM drivers.
> On my AMD Ryzen 5 7520C, when streaming data from cpu memory into amdgpu
> bo, the throughput goes from 5.1GB/s to 6.6GB/s. perf report says
>
> 34.69%--__do_fault
> 34.60%--amdgpu_gem_fault
> 34.00%--ttm_bo_vm_fault_reserved
> 32.95%--vmf_insert_pfn_prot
> 25.89%--track_pfn_insert
> 24.35%--lookup_memtype
> 21.77%--pat_pagerange_is_ram
> 20.80%--walk_system_ram_range
> 17.42%--find_next_iomem_res
>
> before this change, and
>
> 26.67%--__do_fault
> 26.57%--amdgpu_gem_fault
> 25.83%--ttm_bo_vm_fault_reserved
> 24.40%--vmf_insert_pfn_prot
> 14.30%--track_pfn_insert
> 12.20%--lookup_memtype
> 9.34%--pat_pagerange_is_ram
> 8.22%--walk_system_ram_range
> 5.09%--find_next_iomem_res
>
> after.
Is there any documentation that explicitly says that the children resources
must not overlap parent's one? Do we have some test cases? (Either way they
needs to be added / expanded).
P.S> I'm not so sure about this change. It needs a thoroughly testing, esp.
in PCI case. Cc'ing to Ilpo.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists