lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9871cd74-2526-44a3-9986-8810bc733602@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 11:14:21 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>,
 Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
 ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, Henrik Grimler <henrik@...mler.se>,
 Wolfgang Wiedmeyer <wolfgit@...dmeyer.de>,
 Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@...erdimension.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 03/11] mfd: max77693: Add defines for charger current
 control

On 30/05/2024 10:55, Artur Weber wrote:
> From: Wolfgang Wiedmeyer <wolfgit@...dmeyer.de>
> 
> This prepares for an updated regulator and charger driver. The defines
> are needed to set the maximum input current and the fast charge
> current.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Wiedmeyer <wolfgit@...dmeyer.de>
> [GNUtoo@...erdimension.org: small fix]
> Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@...erdimension.org>
> [Artur: swap hardcoded ILIM values for DEFAULT_FAST_CHARGE_CURRENT]
> Signed-off-by: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mfd/max77693-private.h | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

Please squash it with the next patch using the defines. Having just
defines is not really a "change" on its own (I know that AMD will
disagree but they are wrong...).

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ