[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f073e363-f6b2-41df-84b3-4b2cfa2267a8@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 12:02:12 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: userfaultfd: Use swap() in double_pt_lock()
On 31.05.24 11:16, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> Use existing swap() function rather than duplicating its implementation.
>
> ./mm/userfaultfd.c:1006:13-14: WARNING opportunity for swap()
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=9266
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> mm/userfaultfd.c | 10 ++--------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/userfaultfd.c b/mm/userfaultfd.c
> index defa5109cc62..5e7f2801698a 100644
> --- a/mm/userfaultfd.c
> +++ b/mm/userfaultfd.c
> @@ -995,14 +995,8 @@ void double_pt_lock(spinlock_t *ptl1,
> __acquires(ptl1)
> __acquires(ptl2)
> {
> - spinlock_t *ptl_tmp;
> -
> - if (ptl1 > ptl2) {
> - /* exchange ptl1 and ptl2 */
> - ptl_tmp = ptl1;
> - ptl1 = ptl2;
> - ptl2 = ptl_tmp;
> - }
> + if (ptl1 > ptl2)
> + swap(ptl1, ptl2);
> /* lock in virtual address order to avoid lock inversion */
> spin_lock(ptl1);
> if (ptl1 != ptl2)
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists