linux-kernel - Re: [RFC net-next v3 0/2] mlx5: Add netdev-genl queue stats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240530171128.35bd0ee2@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 17:11:28 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 nalramli@...tly.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
 linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org (open list:MELLANOX MLX5 core VPI driver), Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
 Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v3 0/2] mlx5: Add netdev-genl queue stats

On Wed, 29 May 2024 03:16:25 +0000 Joe Damato wrote:
> Worth noting that Tariq suggested I also export HTB/QOS stats in
> mlx5e_get_base_stats.

Why to base, and not report them as queue stats?

Judging by mlx5e_update_tx_netdev_queues() calls sprinkled in
./mlx5/core/en/htb.c it seems that the driver will update the
real_num_tx_queues accordingly. And from mlx5e_qid_from_qos()
it seems like the inverse calculation is:

i - (chs->params.num_channels + is_ptp)*mlx5e_get_dcb_num_tc(&chs->params)

But really, isn't it enough to use priv->txq2sq[i] for the active
queues, and not active ones you've already covered?

> I am open to doing this, but I think if I were to do that, HTB/QOS queue
> stats should also be exported by rtnl so that the script above will
> continue to show that the output is correct.
> 
> I'd like to propose: adding HTB/QOS to both rtnl *and* the netdev-genl
> code together at the same time, but a later time, separate from this
> change.

Hm, are HTB queues really not counted in rtnl? That'd be pretty wrong.