[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <BA0B79E0-6582-45EA-8EA9-35E278B8CC42@exactcode.de>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 12:01:35 +0200
From: René Rebe <rene@...ctcode.de>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
Hristo Venev <hristo@...ev.name>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Radu Sabau <radu.sabau@...log.com>,
Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] hwmon: Add support for SPD5118 compliant temperature
sensors
Hi,
On May 31, 2024, at 11:31, Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>>> Wolfgang seems to think it's important:
>
> Wolfram, please.
>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/tdia472d4pow2osabef24y2ujkkquplfajxmmtk5pnxllsdxsz@wxzynz7llasr/
>>>
>>
>> Ok, but that doesn't explain the reason. Wolfram, Paul, why do you
>> think this is needed ? Note that I am not opposed to adding spd
>> eeprom support, but I'd like to know why I am doing it before
>> I spend time on it.
>
> A working eeprom driver is needed to get 'decode-dimms' from the
> i2c-tools package working. Jean reported that EEPROM access for DDR5 is
> different from DDR4, so it needs a separate driver. And
> i2c_register_spd() then needs to be updated to use the new driver for
> DDR5.
Well my original downstream driver already had eeprom access:
https://svn.exactcode.de/t2/trunk/package/kernel/linux/spd-5118.patch
Note there are some surrounding -2, and parity patches around this patch.
Thanks,
René
--
ExactCODE GmbH, Lietzenburger Str. 42, DE-10789 Berlin
http://exactcode.com | http://exactscan.com | http://ocrkit.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists